<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web app investigation part 1 - JSF</title>
	<link>http://hardlikesoftware.com/weblog/2006/11/28/web-app-investigation-part-1-jsf/</link>
	<description>The writings of John Snyders, mostly about software.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Cbermingham</title>
		<link>http://hardlikesoftware.com/weblog/2006/11/28/web-app-investigation-part-1-jsf/#comment-3</link>
		<author>Cbermingham</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 18:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hardlikesoftware.com/weblog/2006/11/28/web-app-investigation-part-1-jsf/#comment-3</guid>
					<description>John,
Nice blog... did you look at Ruby and rails?  Sd mag had it pegged as the "next big thing" at one point this year.  
Everyone likes using AJAX apps, but I have yet to hear about one that wasn't a mess under the hood.
Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,<br />
Nice blog&#8230; did you look at Ruby and rails?  Sd mag had it pegged as the &#8220;next big thing&#8221; at one point this year.<br />
Everyone likes using AJAX apps, but I have yet to hear about one that wasn&#8217;t a mess under the hood.<br />
Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Snyders</title>
		<link>http://hardlikesoftware.com/weblog/2006/11/28/web-app-investigation-part-1-jsf/#comment-4</link>
		<author>John Snyders</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 18:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hardlikesoftware.com/weblog/2006/11/28/web-app-investigation-part-1-jsf/#comment-4</guid>
					<description>I have heard the buzz about Ruby but have not really investigated the language or Rails. A recent place I worked was using a testing framework based on Ruby called watir with good success. This seems like a good application for Ruby. As for using Ruby for web apps I agree with &lt;a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2006/09/01.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Joel&lt;/a&gt; on this point. Also I’m just not in the mood to learn a new language right now. I’m improving my skills in Java, JavaScript, and XSLT.

I’m looking forward to digging through the mess of AJAX</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have heard the buzz about Ruby but have not really investigated the language or Rails. A recent place I worked was using a testing framework based on Ruby called watir with good success. This seems like a good application for Ruby. As for using Ruby for web apps I agree with <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2006/09/01.html" rel="nofollow">Joel</a> on this point. Also I’m just not in the mood to learn a new language right now. I’m improving my skills in Java, JavaScript, and XSLT.</p>
<p>I’m looking forward to digging through the mess of AJAX</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: captrespect</title>
		<link>http://hardlikesoftware.com/weblog/2006/11/28/web-app-investigation-part-1-jsf/#comment-548</link>
		<author>captrespect</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 15:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hardlikesoftware.com/weblog/2006/11/28/web-app-investigation-part-1-jsf/#comment-548</guid>
					<description>A better way to validate a field based on another is to bind the fields to your backing bean and use the backing bean validation method.

Then you can read the input box of the other field as well as the value passed into the method.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A better way to validate a field based on another is to bind the fields to your backing bean and use the backing bean validation method.</p>
<p>Then you can read the input box of the other field as well as the value passed into the method.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benny's Blog</title>
		<link>http://hardlikesoftware.com/weblog/2006/11/28/web-app-investigation-part-1-jsf/#comment-7700</link>
		<author>Benny's Blog</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 17:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hardlikesoftware.com/weblog/2006/11/28/web-app-investigation-part-1-jsf/#comment-7700</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Streamline your JSF validation framework...&lt;/strong&gt;

If you&#8217;ve every used a Validator in JSF, the chance is that you made your own as well. Read on to find out how you can streamline your code and usage of custom validators. Add your own handmade validators, while using minimum code with maximum fl...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Streamline your JSF validation framework&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve every used a Validator in JSF, the chance is that you made your own as well. Read on to find out how you can streamline your code and usage of custom validators. Add your own handmade validators, while using minimum code with maximum fl&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benny's Blog</title>
		<link>http://hardlikesoftware.com/weblog/2006/11/28/web-app-investigation-part-1-jsf/#comment-8071</link>
		<author>Benny's Blog</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 15:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hardlikesoftware.com/weblog/2006/11/28/web-app-investigation-part-1-jsf/#comment-8071</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Parameterized JSF Facelets Validators...&lt;/strong&gt;

Parameterizable validators are a tricky thing; they need to be represented in various configuration files and on top of that need to be stateful. Read on to find out how you can use validator tags with custom attributes.
......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Parameterized JSF Facelets Validators&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Parameterizable validators are a tricky thing; they need to be represented in various configuration files and on top of that need to be stateful. Read on to find out how you can use validator tags with custom attributes.<br />
&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
