<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Analog TV more robust</title>
	<link>http://hardlikesoftware.com/weblog/2007/06/12/analog-tv-more-robust/</link>
	<description>The writings of John Snyders, mostly about software.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: John Snyders</title>
		<link>http://hardlikesoftware.com/weblog/2007/06/12/analog-tv-more-robust/#comment-773</link>
		<author>John Snyders</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 01:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hardlikesoftware.com/weblog/2007/06/12/analog-tv-more-robust/#comment-773</guid>
					<description>According to &lt;a href="http://dtvfacts.com/latest/414/multicast-tv-samsung-s5h1411/" rel="nofollow"&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; all I need is a receiver with a new digital chip. Even if it works it doesn't change the difference between digital and analog signals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to <a href="http://dtvfacts.com/latest/414/multicast-tv-samsung-s5h1411/" rel="nofollow">this</a> all I need is a receiver with a new digital chip. Even if it works it doesn&#8217;t change the difference between digital and analog signals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randyhughes</title>
		<link>http://hardlikesoftware.com/weblog/2007/06/12/analog-tv-more-robust/#comment-2372</link>
		<author>randyhughes</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hardlikesoftware.com/weblog/2007/06/12/analog-tv-more-robust/#comment-2372</guid>
					<description>i think i will stick with analog tv i have seen digital tv but goverment and broadcasters need to work the bugs out of the new system before anybody shells out money for a new digital television.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think i will stick with analog tv i have seen digital tv but goverment and broadcasters need to work the bugs out of the new system before anybody shells out money for a new digital television.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: digital tv receiver tuner</title>
		<link>http://hardlikesoftware.com/weblog/2007/06/12/analog-tv-more-robust/#comment-7595</link>
		<author>digital tv receiver tuner</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 23:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hardlikesoftware.com/weblog/2007/06/12/analog-tv-more-robust/#comment-7595</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;digital tv receiver tuner...&lt;/strong&gt;

This is what happened at Ferryside and Llansteffan in the UK, and is normally conducted as a trial, although it can be a permanent...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>digital tv receiver tuner&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This is what happened at Ferryside and Llansteffan in the UK, and is normally conducted as a trial, although it can be a permanent&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
