<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comenting out code</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hardlikesoftware.com/weblog/2007/11/28/comenting-out-code/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hardlikesoftware.com/weblog/2007/11/28/comenting-out-code/</link>
	<description>The writings of John Snyders, mostly about software.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 21:26:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://hardlikesoftware.com/weblog/2007/11/28/comenting-out-code/comment-page-1/#comment-3329</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardlikesoftware.com/weblog/2007/11/28/comenting-out-code/#comment-3329</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree more. I also find this widespread practice extremely irritating. Even in the case of &quot;uncomment this code once the foo module is available&quot; I would prefer to use an &quot;ifdef&quot; if possible or at least &quot;TODO: Uncomment this code...&quot; because I will search for those and some IDEs will list them.

Another practice I don&#039;t like is people commenting with the name or initials and date of a change:
// jsmith -- 12/1/2003
The source control system will keep track of that information. Over time, code gets filled with this superfluous meta data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more. I also find this widespread practice extremely irritating. Even in the case of &#8220;uncomment this code once the foo module is available&#8221; I would prefer to use an &#8220;ifdef&#8221; if possible or at least &#8220;TODO: Uncomment this code&#8230;&#8221; because I will search for those and some IDEs will list them.</p>
<p>Another practice I don&#8217;t like is people commenting with the name or initials and date of a change:<br />
// jsmith &#8212; 12/1/2003<br />
The source control system will keep track of that information. Over time, code gets filled with this superfluous meta data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
